# Important Notice About Translation
This content is translated using Google Translate and can be accessed in approximately 30+ languages worldwide, in order to make the content more accessible to non-English speakers. However, due to the limitations of machine translation, many sentences may contain unnatural phrasing, incorrect terminology, or misinterpretation of the original meaning—especially in technical or philosophical contexts. Please be aware that this translation is not professionally edited and may not fully reflect the precise intent or nuance of the original document. For the most accurate understanding, we strongly recommend referring to the original English version of this paper, which represents the author's intended wording and conceptual clarity.


CJM Manifesto 1/3

The First Public Alignment Release

LC Structural Alignment Pilot v0.05-beta

A low-cost, crowd-sourced pilot artifact for translating structural mathematics into reproducible physical observation.

 

In gratitude to
Alan Turing — for the language of computation, and for revealing time as the hidden cost of steps
Albert Einstein — for the language of spacetime, and for loosening time from its throne
Isaac Newton — for the language of forces, and the clarity of law
Grigori Perelman — for the courage of truth
Nikola Tesla — for resonance
CHANGBAL
.

Keunsoo Yoon
Independent Research Group (Seoul, Republic of Korea)
austiny@gatech.edu, austiny@snu.ac.kr

 

May 5, 2026

 

Release Statement

CJM Manifesto 1/3 is not a conventional research paper. It is a first public artifact. It does not claim to solve P vs NP. It does not claim to validate CJM in its final form. It does not ask for belief.

It asks for observation.

A grand theory should not remain trapped in grand language. If a structural claim has physical meaning, even a small circuit should be allowed to ask the first question. CJM Manifesto 1/3 is that first question.

1. The Question

For a long time, the deepest questions of mathematics have remained in the language of proof, abstraction, and symbolic reasoning. P vs NP stands as one of the great mountains of this landscape. Most approaches attempt to climb it directly through formal mathematical proof.

CJM proposes a different form of inquiry: what if certain mathematical structures can also be approached physically? What if solvability, alignment, and structural transition are not only symbolic properties, but can leave traces in resonant systems? What if a mathematical question can be lowered into a physical circuit, not as an answer, but as an experiment?

This release does not present a final conclusion. It presents a public experimental question: can structural alignment leave observable traces in a simple physical system?

2. Electric Language

The first public release begins with electricity because electricity is the language of signal. A pulse, a phase, a frequency, a transition, and an alignment are not merely technical quantities. In this pilot, they form the first vocabulary through which CJM is allowed to speak physically.

The circuit is not the conclusion. It is the first utterance.




 

LC Structural Alignment Pilot v0.05-beta

3. The Circuit

CJM Manifesto 1/3 translates the CJM idea of structural alignment into a low-cost LC resonance pilot. The nominal LC resonance for L = 100 uH and C = 0.1 uF is approximately 50.3 kHz: f0 = 1 / (2*pi*sqrt(LC)).

Because common microcontroller default PWM frequencies may be far below this range, participants should not rely on default PWM output alone. A timer-based output near 50 kHz, a low-cost DDS waveform generator, or a standard laboratory function generator is recommended.

Important beginner note: Default PWM is usually too low for this LC pair. Use Timer1 output near 50 kHz, a DDS module, or a function generator.

4. Bill of Materials and Approximate Cost

Item

Specification

Typical Price (USD)

Microcontroller board

Arduino Uno R3 or compatible board

$8-$25

Breadboard power module

MB102 or similar, 5V mode

$2-$5

Breadboard

Standard solderless breadboard

$3-$8

Jumper wires

Male-male jumper set

$2-$6

Inductor

100 uH

$0.50-$2

Capacitor

0.1 uF film capacitor

$0.20-$1

Protection resistor

100 ohm to 1 k ohm

$0.05-$0.50

USB cable / power

USB cable or 5V supply

$2-$8

Oscilloscope

Two-channel oscilloscope

Existing lab / varies

Estimated entry cost can remain under approximately $20-$50 for participants who already have access to a two-channel oscilloscope. Actual prices depend on country, shipping, official vs compatible parts, and local availability.

 

5. Observation and Data

Recommended setup: CH1 measures the LC node or voltage across the LC section; CH2 measures the input signal; trigger on CH2. Start around 200 us/div and adjust as needed. Record screenshots and, when possible, CSV waveform data.

Suggested data fields: alias, country, date, board type, exact L and C values, resistor value, signal source type, target frequency, duty cycle or waveform type, oscilloscope model, probe locations, time base, screenshot, optional CSV trace, observation result, and notes on possible artifacts.

6. Scope and Boundary

This release is intentionally modest. It is not a completed physical validation of CJM. A full physical validation may require high-Q resonators, low-noise waveform sources, precision frequency stabilization, sapphire-grade structures, and cryogenic temperature control.

If the circuit shows nothing, that result matters. If the circuit shows ordinary resonance, that result matters. If the circuit shows a transient alignment pattern, that result matters. Positive, negative, and uncertain observations are all part of the same evidence field.


 

Circuit Map and Witness Protocol

Figure 1. Low-cost LC structural alignment pilot wiring diagram.

7. The Witness

CJM Manifesto 1/3 is designed not to demand agreement, but to invite participation. A critic does not need to accept CJM to participate. To criticize the protocol meaningfully, one may build the circuit, record the waveform, and produce comparable data.

In this sense, criticism becomes replication, and disagreement becomes measurable evidence.

The project welcomes positive observations, negative observations, uncertain observations, artifact analysis, improved circuit implementations, oscilloscope screenshots, CSV waveform data, and independent replication notes.

8. Citation and Versioning

Recommended citation: Yoon, K. (2026). CJM Manifesto 1_3 The First Public Alignment Release. Zenodo. DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.20038887].

Observe first. Record carefully. Interpret later.

 

Atemporal Position. CJM is not introduced here as a faster digital calculator or as an ordinary analog optimizer. Its atemporal claim is narrower and deeper: an encoded structure may already contain its admissible True/False condition before sequential search is performed. The LC pilot asks whether such a pre-existing structural condition can leave a reproducible physical alignment response in a resonant circuit.

 

Open Question.
Does a problem  admit a solution if and only if it is structurally admissible under atemporal resonance?

 

 

References

 

1. Turing, A. M. (1936–1937). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Series 2, 42(1), 230–265. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.230

 

2. Riemann, B. (1859). Ueber die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Grösse. Monatsberichte der Berliner Akademie, November 1859, 671–680.

 

3. Montgomery, H. L. (1973). The pair correlation of zeros of the zeta function. In Analytic Number Theory, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 24, 181–193. American Mathematical Society.

 

4. Odlyzko, A. M. (1992). The 10^20-th zero of the Riemann zeta function and 70 million of its neighbors. Unpublished manuscript / computational report.

 

5. Conrey, J. B. (2003). The Riemann Hypothesis. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 50(3), 341–353.

 

6. Schumayer, D., & Hutchinson, D. A. W. (2011). Colloquium: Physics of the Riemann hypothesis. Reviews of Modern Physics, 83, 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.307

 

7. Cook, S. A. (1971). The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/800157.805047

 

8. Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38, 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01700692

 

9. Prigogine, I. (1978). Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science, 201(4358), 777–785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4358.777

 

10. Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different. Science, 177(4047), 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.177.4047.393

 

11. Maxwell, J. C. (1865). A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 155, 459–512. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1865.0008

 

12. Tesla, N. (1891). Experiments with alternating currents of very high frequency and their application to methods of artificial illumination. Lecture before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, New York.

 

13. Coakley, K. J., Splett, J. D., Janezic, M. D., & Kaiser, R. F. (2003). Estimation of Q-factors and resonant frequencies. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 51(3), 862–868. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2003.808578

 

14. Horowitz, P., & Hill, W. (2015). The Art of Electronics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

 

15. Yoon, K. (2025). P ≡ NP: On the end of time. Zenodo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18139629

 

16. Yoon, K. (2026). On Structural Criticality: Atemporal Topological Discrimination of the Riemann Hypothesis.

Zenodo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18195907

 

17. Yoon, K. (2026). On Structural Form: Atemporal Coherence of Hodge Classes in Algebraic Varieties

Zenodo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19353046


This code does not submit the full 3SAT formula as a single physical object. Instead, it uses a toy 3SAT formula to generate a small, repeatable set of assignment-labeled frequency trials. The purpose is not to demonstrate computational advantage, but to test whether the LC-CJM setup can produce reproducible alignment-like responses under controlled symbolic trial conditions.

 

/*

  CJM Manifesto 1/3

  LC Structural Alignment Pilot v0.05-beta

 

  Arduino Uno R3 Serial-Controlled Timer1 Output

 

  Output:

    D9 / OC1A

 

  Serial command format:

    F50000

    F50300

    F49700

 

  Meaning:

    Set output frequency in Hz.

 

  Important:

    This is for Arduino Uno / ATmega328P at 16 MHz.

*/

 

const int outputPin = 9;

 

void setupTimer1(float frequencyHz) {

  if (frequencyHz < 1000) frequencyHz = 1000;

  if (frequencyHz > 200000) frequencyHz = 200000;

 

  // Fast PWM mode 14, TOP = ICR1

  // Frequency = 16 MHz / (prescaler * (1 + ICR1))

  // Prescaler = 1

  unsigned long top = (unsigned long)(16000000.0 / frequencyHz) - 1;

 

  if (top < 1) top = 1;

  if (top > 65535) top = 65535;

 

  noInterrupts();

 

  TCCR1A = 0;

  TCCR1B = 0;

  TCNT1 = 0;

 

  ICR1 = top;

  OCR1A = top / 2; // 50% duty cycle

 

  // Non-inverting output on OC1A / D9

  TCCR1A |= (1 << COM1A1);

 

  // Fast PWM mode 14

  TCCR1A |= (1 << WGM11);

  TCCR1B |= (1 << WGM13) | (1 << WGM12);

 

  // Prescaler = 1

  TCCR1B |= (1 << CS10);

 

  interrupts();

}

 

void setup() {

  pinMode(outputPin, OUTPUT);

  Serial.begin(115200);

 

  setupTimer1(50000.0);

 

  Serial.println("CJM-LC READY");

  Serial.println("Send command like F50000");

}

 

void loop() {

  if (Serial.available()) {

    String cmd = Serial.readStringUntil('\n');

    cmd.trim();

 

    if (cmd.length() > 1 && cmd.charAt(0) == 'F') {

      float freq = cmd.substring(1).toFloat();

 

      setupTimer1(freq);

 

      Serial.print("OK ");

      Serial.println(freq, 2);

    } else {

      Serial.println("ERR");

    }

  }

}

 

 

pip install pyserial

 

Beginner note: pip is Python’s package installer. The command pip install pyserial downloads and installs the serial communication library needed by this experiment. Without pyserial, the Python script can still be read, but it will not be able to connect to the Arduino over USB.

 

 

"""

CJM Manifesto 1/3

LC Structural Alignment Pilot v0.05-beta

 

Simple 3SAT USB Trial Runner

 

Purpose:

    1. Detect Arduino-compatible serial port.

    2. Send trial frequencies near LC resonance.

    3. Export CSV submission template.

 

Important:

    Upload the provided Arduino sketch first.

    This Python script does not read oscilloscope data.

    Participants fill observation fields after checking CH1/CH2 manually.

"""

 

import csv

import math

import time

from itertools import product

 

import serial

from serial.tools import list_ports

 

 

# ------------------------------------------------------------

# LC setup

# ------------------------------------------------------------

L_HENRY = 100e-6

C_FARAD = 0.1e-6

F0_HZ = 1.0 / (2.0 * math.pi * math.sqrt(L_HENRY * C_FARAD))

 

 

# ------------------------------------------------------------

# Toy 3SAT formula

# ------------------------------------------------------------

CLAUSES = [

    (+1, +2, -3),

    (-1, +2, +3),

    (+1, -2, +3),

]

 

 

def eval_literal(literal, assignment):

    var = abs(literal)

    value = assignment[var]

    return value if literal > 0 else not value

 

 

def eval_clause(clause, assignment):

    return any(eval_literal(lit, assignment) for lit in clause)

 

 

def eval_formula(clauses, assignment):

    results = [eval_clause(clause, assignment) for clause in clauses]

    satisfied_count = sum(results)

    sat_ratio = satisfied_count / len(clauses)

    is_satisfying = all(results)

    return is_satisfying, sat_ratio

 

 

def assignment_to_frequency(assignment):

    """

    Convert assignment into a small frequency offset around LC resonance.

 

    This is only a repeatable trial schedule.

    It is not a proof mapping.

    """

    bits = [assignment[1], assignment[2], assignment[3]]

    code = sum((1 << i) for i, bit in enumerate(bits) if bit)

 

    # 8 assignments -> offsets from -350 Hz to +350 Hz

    offset_hz = (code - 3.5) * 100.0

 

    return F0_HZ + offset_hz

 

 

# ------------------------------------------------------------

# Serial detection

# ------------------------------------------------------------

def find_arduino_port():

    ports = list(list_ports.comports())

 

    if not ports:

        raise RuntimeError("No serial ports found. Is the Arduino connected by USB?")

 

    keywords = [

        "arduino",

        "uno",

        "ch340",

        "wch",

        "usb serial",

        "usb-serial",

        "cp210",

    ]

 

    for port in ports:

        desc = f"{port.description} {port.manufacturer or ''}".lower()

        if any(k in desc for k in keywords):

            return port.device

 

    # Fallback: if only one serial device exists, use it.

    if len(ports) == 1:

        return ports[0].device

 

    print("Multiple serial ports found:")

    for i, port in enumerate(ports, start=1):

        print(f"{i}. {port.device} | {port.description}")

 

    choice = int(input("Select port number: "))

    return ports[choice - 1].device

 

 

def connect_arduino(port, baudrate=115200):

    ser = serial.Serial(port, baudrate=baudrate, timeout=2)

 

    # Arduino resets when serial opens.

    time.sleep(2.5)

 

    # Read any startup text.

    while ser.in_waiting:

        line = ser.readline().decode(errors="ignore").strip()

        if line:

            print("Arduino:", line)

 

    return ser

 

 

def send_frequency(ser, frequency_hz):

    cmd = f"F{frequency_hz:.2f}\n"

    ser.write(cmd.encode("utf-8"))

    ser.flush()

 

    reply = ser.readline().decode(errors="ignore").strip()

    return reply

 

 

# ------------------------------------------------------------

# Main

# ------------------------------------------------------------

def main():

    output_file = "cjm_3sat_lc_trials_usb.csv"

 

    print("CJM Manifesto 1/3 | LC Structural Alignment Pilot v0.05-beta")

    print(f"Nominal LC resonance: {F0_HZ:.2f} Hz")

    print()

 

    port = find_arduino_port()

    print(f"Detected serial port: {port}")

 

    ser = connect_arduino(port)

 

    rows = []

 

    try:

        for trial_id, values in enumerate(product([False, True], repeat=3), start=1):

            assignment = {

                1: values[0],

                2: values[1],

                3: values[2],

            }

 

            is_satisfying, sat_ratio = eval_formula(CLAUSES, assignment)

            target_frequency = assignment_to_frequency(assignment)

            assignment_bits = "".join("1" if assignment[i] else "0" for i in [1, 2, 3])

 

            print()

            print(f"Trial {trial_id}")

            print(f"Assignment x1x2x3: {assignment_bits}")

            print(f"Target frequency: {target_frequency:.2f} Hz")

 

            reply = send_frequency(ser, target_frequency)

            print(f"Arduino reply: {reply}")

 

            input("Observe oscilloscope CH1/CH2, save screenshot if needed, then press Enter...")

 

            rows.append({

                "trial_id": trial_id,

                "assignment_bits_x1x2x3": assignment_bits,

                "x1": int(assignment[1]),

                "x2": int(assignment[2]),

                "x3": int(assignment[3]),

                "assignment_satisfies_toy_3sat": int(is_satisfying),

                "assignment_clause_satisfaction_ratio": round(sat_ratio, 4),

                "lc_L_uH": 100,

                "lc_C_uF": 0.1,

                "nominal_f0_hz": round(F0_HZ, 2),

                "target_frequency_hz": round(target_frequency, 2),

                "serial_port": port,

                "arduino_reply": reply,

 

                # Participant-filled fields

               "observed_response": "", # alignment_observed / not_observed / inconclusive / possible_artifact

                "alignment_strength_0_to_5": "",

                "ch1_setting": "",

                "ch2_setting": "",

                "timebase": "",

                "scope_model": "",

                "screenshot_filename": "",

                "csv_waveform_filename": "",

                "notes": "",

            })

 

    finally:

        ser.close()

 

    with open(output_file, "w", newline="", encoding="utf-8") as f:

        writer = csv.DictWriter(f, fieldnames=rows[0].keys())

        writer.writeheader()

        writer.writerows(rows)

 

    print()

    print(f"CSV generated: {output_file}")

    print("Fill observation fields and submit the completed CSV with screenshots or waveform files.")

 

 

if __name__ == "__main__":

    main()

 

 

This Python script is intended to be used together with the accompanying Arduino serial-control sketch. Before running the Python script, participants must first upload the Arduino sketch to an Arduino Uno R3 or compatible microcontroller board. The Arduino sketch enables the board to receive frequency commands over the USB serial connection and generate a corresponding output signal on the selected PWM/timer output pin.

After the Arduino is connected to the computer by USB, the Python script attempts to detect the correct serial port automatically. If multiple serial devices are connected, the script may ask the participant to select the appropriate port manually. Once the connection is established, the script generates a small set of trial conditions derived from a toy 3SAT instance. These trial conditions are not intended to prove or solve 3SAT physically. They are used only as a simple, repeatable structural input schedule for testing the LC alignment pilot.

For each trial, the Python script sends a target frequency near the nominal LC resonance frequency of the 100 µH and 0.1 µF circuit pair. The Arduino then updates its timer output so that the participant can observe the LC response on the oscilloscope. The recommended setup is to connect CH1 to the LC node or across the LC section, connect CH2 to the input signal, and trigger the oscilloscope on CH2. After each frequency is sent, the script pauses and waits for the participant to inspect the oscilloscope display, save a screenshot if desired, and optionally export waveform data from the oscilloscope.

The script does not automatically read oscilloscope data. It only controls the Arduino trial sequence and creates a CSV file for submission. Participants should manually record their observations in the generated CSV file, including whether alignment-like behavior was observed, not observed, or uncertain. When possible, participants should also attach oscilloscope screenshots or raw waveform CSV files and reference those filenames in the submission CSV.

The purpose of this script is to make the pilot experiment repeatable and easy to document. It provides a common trial structure, common target frequencies, and a common data format so that results from different participants and different experimental environments can later be compared. Positive, negative, and uncertain observations are all valuable, provided that the circuit conditions, measurement settings, and data files are clearly recorded.

 

 

 

 

 

 


REPLICATION REPORT FORM

CJM Manifesto 1/3    LC Structural Alignment Pilot v0.05-beta
Use this form to submit a positive, negative, uncertain, or artifact-related replication result.

 

Instruction. Complete this form after reproducing the LC alignment pilot. Attach oscilloscope screenshots, waveform CSV files, and a circuit photo whenever possible. Positive, negative, uncertain, and artifact-related observations are all welcome. Please submit the completed form and any supporting files to austiny@snu.ac.kr or austiny@gatech.edu.

 

1. Participant Information

Name / Alias

 

Country / Region

 

Date of Experiment

 

Contact / Repo Link

 

 

 

 

2. Hardware Setup

Board / Controller

 

Signal Source

Arduino / DDS / Function Gen / Other

Inductor

 

Capacitor

 

Protection Resistor

 

Power Source

 

Oscilloscope Model

 

 

 

 

3. Measurement Setup

CH1 Connection

 

CH2 Connection

 

Trigger Source

 

Time Base

 

Voltage Scale

CH1 ________   CH2 ________

Target Frequency

 

 

4. Observation Result

Observed Alignment

Alignment observed  

No alignment observed  

Inconclusive

Possible artifact

Alignment Strength

0   1   2   3   4   5    (None → Strong)

General Impression

 

Artifact Notes

 

 

 

5. Attached Evidence

Screenshot File

 

Waveform CSV File

 

Circuit Photo File

 

Additional File

 

 

6. Notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Participant Statement

I understand that this submission is not treated as final proof or disproof of CJM. It is a replication observation intended to support comparison across independent setups.

 

Signature / Alias: ______________________      Date: ______________________